Are y'all sick to death of Springsteen and Vote for Change?
Well, I'll try to make this my last entry on the subject. Time has an article about the tour and what the artists are hoping to accomplish. Rolling Stone interviewed Bruce about why he's entering the political arena for the first time in his 30+ year career. And there's quite a lively debate about whether he should even be doing this on the discussion page at brucespringsteen.net. As of this writing, the thread is 119 pages long, at 20 posts per page.
I've read the interviews (though not the thread...I had other stuff to do today!) and I'm purring inside at the ideas expressed:
I may write something more Monday night, after the broadcast on the Sundance Channel. But now I'll give it a rest.
I've read the interviews (though not the thread...I had other stuff to do today!) and I'm purring inside at the ideas expressed:
- The artist as a voice, just a voice.
- Responsibility to your fans and to your ideals.
- The limits of what the musicians can do, but how they felt it was so necessary to do it anyway.
I may write something more Monday night, after the broadcast on the Sundance Channel. But now I'll give it a rest.
1 Comments:
IMHO it is a silly debate whether or not a person like Springsteen should be involved in the political process if they want to be, of course they should be involved.
Celebs get a bad rap because some of them are idiots, but even the idiots have a right to be involved in the political process.
Naturally Springsteen IMO is not an idiot so he is much easier to take.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home